Abstract
Objectives: The present study compares the survival rates of 186 conventional and no-prep/minimally invasive porcelain veneers in 35 patients over a mean period of 9 years. Materials and methods: The veneers were placed on the incisors, canines, and premolars in 35 patients between January 2009 and December 2010. Fourteen patients received 84 conventional veneers, and 21 patients received 102 no-prep/minimally invasive veneers. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after every 6 months until June 2019 based on modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The data was analyzed by using Wilcoxon–Breslow–Gehan and Taron–Ware tests. Kaplan–Meier survival and success curves were plotted for two groups of veneers. The results were compared by using the log rank test. A test probability of P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Smielak, B., Armata, O., & Bojar, W. (2022). A prospective comparative analysis of the survival rates of conventional vs no-prep/minimally invasive veneers over a mean period of 9 years. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(3), 3049–3059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04289-6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.