The test-retest reliability of three different hip joint centre location techniques

46Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The hip joint centre (HJC) is essential in kinematic analyses. Three principal techniques exist for the estimation of the HJC, anatomical, functional and projection, although their test-retest has not been established. Fifteen participants ran at 4.0 m.s-1 ± 5%; 3-D kinematics of the hip and knee were collected. The HJC was defined twice using each technique (test-and-retest) and the kinematic data was applied to both. The results show significant test-retest differences in the coronal and transverse planes using the functional and projection techniques. Strong test-retest intraclass-correlations were observed for all techniques although the anatomical method was associated with the highest reliability. The anatomical technique for HJC estimation appears to be the most reliable; therefore its utilization for 3-D analyses is recommended. © ACAPS, EDP Sciences, 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinclair, J., Taylor, P., Currigan, G., & Hobbs, S. (2014). The test-retest reliability of three different hip joint centre location techniques. Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite, 83, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2013066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free