Early opposition to obstetric anaesthesia

23Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Some of the arguments used to oppose the introduction of inhalation anaesthesia–especially in obstetrics—are considered. These arguments were mainly based upon a desire to retain the sensation of pain, either as a factor necessary for survival or as a diagnostic aid: moral arguments were also adduced but religious opposition is no more than a myth of historiography. The opposition to anaesthesia lasted for less than 15 years and is seen as essentially a reflection of contemporary views on the role of pain. Copyright © 1980, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

FARR, A. D. (1980). Early opposition to obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 35(9), 896–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb03951.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free