Rethinking Aristophanes' comic hero: Utopianism, ambiguity, and Athenian politics

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper aims to reconsider the so-called 'comic heroism' in Aristophanes' extant plays. The comic hero does not always express the collective self-image, like Dicaeopolis in Acharnians and Trygaios in Peace; Knights, as early as 424 BC, is a telling instance of Aristophanes' will to introduce a much more nuanced picture of both the imaginary and the real Athens. Clouds and Wasps also provide further variations. But the real turning point comes in 414 with Birds, whose much disputed political meaning deserves the closest attention. After the ambiguous, disquieting Peisetaerus, comic heroes will not entirely disappear from Aristophanic comedy, yet their nature will never be the same again. Good ideas may come from a clever woman (Lysistrata), a cowardly god (Dionysus in Frogs), or even Apollo's shrine (in the late Plutus), no longer from the Attic 'common man' of the earlier plays. The political evolution of Athens during the Peloponnesian War appears to have altered Aristophanes' (alleged) trust in some kind of 'saviour' emerging from the erratic mass of Athenian male citizens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magnelli, E. (2017). Rethinking Aristophanes’ comic hero: Utopianism, ambiguity, and Athenian politics. Polis (United Kingdom), 34(2), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free