The crime of embezzlement of public funds and the appropiation of “representation expenses” of the Congress

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article discusses whether the collection and non-return of “representation expenses” by Congressmen of the Republic of Peru may result in criminal liability for the crime of embezzlement of public funds when they do not do correctly the representation activity, since it would be a monetary amount that constitutes a public funds that has been entrusted to the public official for his administration by reason of his office. In this regard, the legal nature of “representation expenses” will also be analyzed in order to argue that they are in fact “travel expenses” who must be duly regularized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chanjan Documet, R., Quispe Meza, D., Cesar Puchuri Torres, F., Guevara Valera, M., Cano Tacza, K., & Borjas Torres, P. (2019). The crime of embezzlement of public funds and the appropiation of “representation expenses” of the Congress. Ius et Veritas, 2019(59), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201902.018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free