Compassionate Curiosity: Mitigating the Effects of Bias Through Motivational Interviewing

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is strong evidence that the implicit biases of health care professionals affect the treatment of patients, and that minority and other marginalized patients are disproportionately harmed. Assumptions made about patient knowledge or lack thereof function as judgments that are prone to bias, which then affect the education and advice imposed upon patients. We review how the motivational interviewing (MI) approach to patient engagement includes components of evidence-based bias-mitigating strategies, such as understanding circumstances from the patient’s point of view, and therefore we propose that the MI approach can reduce the impact of bias in patient care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hershberger, P. J., Bricker, D. A., Castle, A., Crawford, T. N., Flowers, S. R., Goff, A. L., & Conway, K. (2024). Compassionate Curiosity: Mitigating the Effects of Bias Through Motivational Interviewing. Health Equity, 8(1), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0054

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free