Morphology comparison of individually selected hyperactivated and non-hyperactivated human spermatozoa

17Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the morphology of human spermatozoa undergoing hyperactivated motility in vitro with those that were non-hyperactivated (non-hyp). Hyperactivation criteria were established by the Hobson Sperm Tracker (HST), sampling at 25 Hz, as curvilinear velocity (VCL) ≥ 70 μm/s, amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH) ≥ 7 μm, linearity (LIN) ≤ 30% and straight-line velocity (VSL) ≤ 30 μm/s. Specially developed software incorporated in the HST produced a white computer-generated overlay for spermatozoa satisfying hyperactivation criteria. These spermatozoa, visually identified on a tracking monitor, were individually removed with micromanipulation equipment using a 12 μm-diameter needle. Fifty-six patient ejaculates were examined comprising a total morphological analysis of 1886 non-hyp spermatozoa and 1051 hyperactivated spermatozoa. Hyperactivated spermatozoa had a significantly higher mean percentage of normal heads and small acrosomes (P < 0.0001 and < 0.0001 respectively) and a significantly lower percentage of large and round heads, midpieces and tail defects (P = 0.002, < 0.0001, 0.02 and < 0.0001 respectively) when compared with non-hyp spermatozoa. These data demonstrate, for the first time, that a homogeneous live population of human hyperactivated spermatozoa, selected in vitro from patients with highly variable degrees of teratozoospermia, is comprised predominantly of cells with normal morphology (P < 0.0001).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Green, S., & Fishel, S. (1999). Morphology comparison of individually selected hyperactivated and non-hyperactivated human spermatozoa. Human Reproduction, 14(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.1.123

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free