Medium-term Results Evaluation between Gender-Specific x Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To compare the postoperative functional result of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with gender-specific prosthesis versus TKA with conventional prosthesis in a 5-year period. Methods Retrospective study with functional evaluation of 30 patients (15 patients from each group) using scores (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities arthritis index [WOMAC], and The Knee Society Clinical Rating System [KSS]) and range of motion (ROM) as methods of assessment. Results The differences found between the score values and ROM were not statistically significant. Conclusion The gender-specific prosthesis presents functional results equal to those of conventional prosthesis after 5 years postoperatively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Colleoni, J. L., Ribeiro, F. N., Campos, A. R., De Siqueira Junior, D., Campos, A. G., & Mos, P. A. C. (2020). Medium-term Results Evaluation between Gender-Specific x Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 55(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697971

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free