Performance of different types of time domain reflectometry probes for water content measurement in partially saturated rocks

33Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In applying TDR for water content estimation in rocks, the special considerations required include (1) elimination of inaccuracies resulting from gap effects, (2) difficulties in installation of TDR probes, and (3) the need for individual calibration functions between the apparent dielectric constant (Ka) and water content (θ) specific to each rock type. Using seven different rock types, we demonstrate that carefully applied conductive silicone fillings can eliminate gap effects in the case of the penetration-type probes. We also propose two designs for surface probes, which can be installed relatively easily and are found to be free of errors attributable to gap effects. Measurement accuracy of three probe types is comparable to conventional water content measurement in soils. Error due to the difference in K a-θ calibration functions obtained with different probe types is more significant than error due to variation in a single measurement or spatial variability in rock properties. Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sakaki, T., & Rajaram, H. (2006). Performance of different types of time domain reflectometry probes for water content measurement in partially saturated rocks. Water Resources Research, 42(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004643

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free