Computational stylometry: predicting the authorship of investment arbitration awards

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of the legal stylometry literature, and its utility in providing insight into the authorship of otherwise anonymous legal texts. After first exploring the use of machine learning stylometry models, and their relevance to analysing the texts produced by investor-state arbitration proceedings, the chapter then demonstrates how the stylistic features of these texts can be used to infer authorship. The resulting analysis suggests both that there is significant variation in styles between academic writing and the applied legal writing that arises in arbitration proceedings, and that there is significant variety within arbitral award writing styles, even when the texts have the same authorship.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Langford, M., Behn, D., & Lie, R. (2020). Computational stylometry: predicting the authorship of investment arbitration awards. In Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research (pp. 53–76). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977456.00008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free