Cerebral potentials evoked by oesophageal distension in patients with non-cardiac chest pain

88Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cerebral evoked potential recording was used to study the oesophagus-brain axis in 10 controls and 10 patients with non-cardiac chest pain with a manometric diagnosis of either nutcracker oesophagus or diffuse spasm and a positive edrophonium test. A series of 50 inflations (10/minute; inflation rate of 170 ml/ second) of an intraoesophageal balloon (5 cm proximal to the lower oesophageal sphincter) was performed in each subject. Three different inflation volumes were used and were individually determined to cause no sensation, slight sensation, and definite sensation, respectively (volume ranges: 2-8 ml, 5-18 ml, and 8-22 ml). All signals were coded and their quality was scored on a scale from 0 (no recognisable pattern) to 5 (well denned potential of good quality) by four 'blinded' observers. The evoked potential quality scores and amplitude of the major peaks increased significantly (p<0·01) with increasing sensation, both in patients and in controls. In the patients, quality score and amplitude of all four peaks of the evoked potentials were lower (p<0·05) and latencies of two of the four peaks were longer (p<0·02) than in the controls. The volumes of air required to produce the various sensations were lower in the patients (p<0·01). When divided by the balloon volume, amplitude and quality of the evoked potential were no longer significantly different between the groups. These results suggest that the increased perception of oesophageal distension in patients with non-cardiac chest pain is caused by altered central processing rather than (functionally) abnormal receptors in the oesophageal wall.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smout, A. J. P. M., DeVore, M. S., Dalton, C. B., & Castell, D. O. (1992). Cerebral potentials evoked by oesophageal distension in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Gut, 33(3), 298–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.33.3.298

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free