Abstract
Background Data from a randomized Phase II trial (NCT00628251) of olaparib (capsules, 200 or 400 mg bid, n=32 per arm) vs pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, n=33) in gBRCAm OC pts with recurrence <12 months after prior platinum therapy indicated efficacy for olaparib (Kaye et al. JCO 2012). However, the efficacy of PLD was higher than previously reported in this setting. We led a confirmatory Phase III, open‐label study of olaparib vs non‐platinum chemotherapy in gBRCAm PSR OC pts (NCT02282020). Methods Pts were randomized (2:1) to olaparib tablets (300 mg bid) or chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) (paclitaxel [P; 80 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1), D8, D15, D22 every 4 weeks (q4w)], topotecan [T; 4 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 q4w], gemcitabine [G; 1000 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 q4w] or PLD [50 mg/m2 D1 q4w]) until progression, stratified by: TPC, prior lines of chemotherapy (2‐3 vs >4) and platinum‐free interval (6‐12 vs >12 months). Primary endpoint: ORR (blinded independent central review [BICR]). Secondary end‐points included PFS and safety. Results 266 gBRCAm PSR OC pts were randomized (olaparib, n=178; TPC, n=88 [PLD, n=47; P, n=20; G, n=13; T, n=8]); 12 in the TPC arm withdrew before receiving study treatment. 223 pts (84%) had baseline BICR measurable disease (olaparib, n=151; TPC, n=72). ORR was 72% with olaparib vs 51% with TPC (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.40‐4.58; P=0.002). HR for PFS by BICR was 0.62 (95% CI 0.43‐0.91; P=0.013; median 13.4 vs 9.2 months [olaparib vs TPC]) and by investigator assessment was 0.49 (95% CI 0.35‐0.70; P<0.001; median 13.2 vs 8.5 months, respectively). Most common adverse events (AEs) with olaparib were nausea (65% vs 34% [TPC]) and anemia (50% vs 25%) and with TPC were palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE; 36% vs 1% [olaparib]) and nausea. Most common grade >3 AEs in either arm were anemia (21% [olaparib] vs 0 [TPC]), PPE (0 vs 12%) and neutropenia (6% vs 11%). For olaparib vs TPC, serious AEs were reported by 24% vs 18% and AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 7% vs 20%. Conclusions Pts with gBRCAm PSR OC receiving olaparib monotherapy had a significant, clinically relevant improvement in ORR and PFS vs TPC, with no new safety signals.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Penson, R. T., Valencia, R. V., Cibula, D., Colombo, N., III, C. L., Bidzinski, M., … Scambia, G. (2019). 33 Olaparib monotherapy versus (VS) chemotherapy for germline BRCA-mutated (GBRCAM) platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSR OC) patients (PTS): phase III solo3 trial. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 29, A21. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-igcs.33
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.