Inferior Turbinate Size and CPAP Titration Based Treatment Pressures: No Association Found among Patients Who Have Not Had Nasal Surgery

  • Camacho M
  • Zaghi S
  • Tran D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective . To evaluate the effect of turbinate sizes on the titrated continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapeutic treatment pressures for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have not had nasal surgery. Study Design . Retrospective case series. Methods . A chart review was performed for 250 consecutive patients. Results . 45 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) for age was 54.6±22.4 years and for body mass index was 28.5±5.9 kg/m 2 . The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ( rs ) between CPAP therapeutic treatment pressures and several variables were calculated and were weakly correlated (age rs=0.29 , nasal obstruction rs=-0.30 ), moderately correlated (body mass index rs=0.42 and lowest oxygen saturation rs=-0.47 ), or strongly correlated (apnea-hypopnea index rs=0.60 and oxygen desaturation index ( rs=0.62 )). No statistical significance was found with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) between CPAP therapeutic treatment pressures and inferior turbinate size (right turbinates p value = 0.2012, left turbinate p value = 0.3064), nasal septal deviation ( p value = 0.4979), or mask type ( p value = 0.5136). Conclusion . In this study, CPAP titration based therapeutic treatment pressures were not found to be associated with inferior turbinate sizes; however, the CPAP therapeutic treatment pressures were strongly correlated with apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Camacho, M., Zaghi, S., Tran, D., Song, S. A., Chang, E. T., & Certal, V. (2016). Inferior Turbinate Size and CPAP Titration Based Treatment Pressures: No Association Found among Patients Who Have Not Had Nasal Surgery. International Journal of Otolaryngology, 2016, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5951273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free