The illusion of choice: an exploratory study looking at the top 10 food companies in Australia and their brand connections

7Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To identify the brands owned by each of the 10 top grossing food companies operating in Australia and visually represent them on an infographic. Methods: Desktop research was conducted to determine Australia's 10 largest food companies based on revenue. Brand ownership for each of the companies was traced through financial records and company publications. This information was then visually documented in the form of an infographic ‘food web’ to clearly illustrate company and brand ownership. Results: Fonterra, Coca-Cola Amatil, Lion, Murray Goulburn, George Weston Foods, Wilmar, Nestle, Mondelez, Parmalat and Asahi were determined as the top 10 food companies operating in Australia. The food web illustrated that brand ownership ranged from 75 (Nestle) to four (Fonterra) brands per company. Conclusions: The food web illustrates the dominance of each of these major companies within Australia and shows how their diverse brand ownership limits consumer choice. Implications for public health: This study expands on current knowledge and further defines the breadth of market influence that the top 10 food companies have within the Australian food context, and how they use their brand power to create an illusion of choice for consumers. The food web will assist in promoting transparency of brand ownership in the Australian food market, therefore allowing consumers to make an informed decision about the food they purchase, and will allow community and other organisations to make an informed decision about which companies they form partnerships with.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vidler, A. C., Stoneham, M., Edmunds, M., & Sartori, A. (2018). The illusion of choice: an exploratory study looking at the top 10 food companies in Australia and their brand connections. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 42(6), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12828

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free