How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate EM for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?

83Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field EM can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in EM that result from errors in an LMN boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several LMN coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate EM. We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly EM = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA-ve), MVA of E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD-B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle-in-cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA-ve and MDD-B. The L and M directions are most reliably determined by MVA-ve when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the M direction obtained by MDD-B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD-B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify EM from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Genestreti, K. J., Nakamura, T. K. M., Nakamura, R., Denton, R. E., Torbert, R. B., Burch, J. L., … Russell, C. T. (2018). How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate EM for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123(11), 9130–9149. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025711

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free