The quest for a consistent signal in ground and GRACE gravity time-series

18Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent studies show that terrestrial and space-based observations of gravity agree over Europe. In this paper, we compare time-series of terrestrial gravity (including the contribution due to surface displacement) as measured by superconducting gravimeters (SGs), space-based observations from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and predicted changes in gravity derived from two global hydrological models at 10 SG stations in central Europe. Despite the fact that all observations and models observe a maximum in the same season due to water storage changes, there is little agreement between the SG time-series even when they are separated by distances smaller than the spatial resolution of GRACE. We also demonstrate that GRACE and the SG observations and the water storage models do not display significant correlation at seasonal periods nor at interannual periods. These findings are consistent with the fact that the SGs are sensitive primarily to mass changes in the few hundred metres surrounding the station. © The Authors 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Camp, M., de Viron, O., Métivier, L., Meurers, B., & Francis, O. (2014). The quest for a consistent signal in ground and GRACE gravity time-series. Geophysical Journal International, 197(1), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt524

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free