The ethics of unsolicited diagnosis of mental disorder in acquaintances: Benefits and dangers

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I examine here the activity of 'unsolicited diagnosis' of psychiatric disorder- the act of informing a person that they show signs and symptoms of mental disorder, outside of a patient-professional relationship. Whether unsolicited psychiatric diagnosis is a legitimate ethical activity for psychiatrists (and other healthcare professionals) in which to engage is an issue founded upon the trade-off between potential benefits and harm to the recipient of the diagnosis. However, potential harm specific to a psychiatric diagnosis (such as issues related to stigma, confidentiality and paternalism) suggests that making unsolicited diagnoses of psychiatric disorder is even more ethically fraught than making unsolicited diagnoses of physical disorder.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchell, E. W. (2011). The ethics of unsolicited diagnosis of mental disorder in acquaintances: Benefits and dangers. Psychiatrist, 35(8), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.110.032953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free