Abstract
How have Muslim scholars viewed followers of other religions, mainly ahl al-kitāb (the People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians)? Islamic laws in two areas - slaughter and marriage - reflect both an attempt to separate Muslims from non-monotheists (demonstrated by rules against consuming meat from animais slaughtered by non-monotheists and against marrying their women), and the permissibility of contact between Muslims and ahl al-kitāb. The extent of these contacts is dictated by two opposing motives: the desire to maintain ties with ahl al-kitāb, and a wish to avoid the danger to the Islamic framework posed by these ties. Consequently, Muslim jurists generally permit meat from slaughter by ahl al-kitāb - even when the obligation to mention the ñame of Allāh has not been fulfilled - but most jurists prohibit meat from an animal slaughtered by a Christian who recites the name of Jesus over the slaughter. Similarly, the marriage law, which allows certain kinds of marriage between Muslims and ahl al-kitāb, prohibits marriages that result in the inferiority of the Muslim to a kitābī spouse, for such inferiority carnes with it the danger of assimilation.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Tsafrir, N. (2005). The attitude of sunnī Islam toward Jews and Christians as reflected in some legal issues. Al-Qantara, 26(2), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.3989/alqantara.2005.v26.i2.96
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.