Deimatism: A neglected component of antipredator defence

79Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Deimatic or 'startle' displays cause a receiver to recoil reflexively in response to a sudden change in sensory input. Deimatism is sometimes implicitly treated as a form of aposematism (unprofitability associated with a signal). However, the fundamental difference is, in order to provide protection, deimatism does not require a predator to have any learned or innate aversion. Instead, deimatism can confer a survival advantage by exploiting existing neural mechanisms in away that releases a reflexive response in the predator. We discuss the differences among deimatism, aposematism, and forms of mimicry, and their ecological and evolutionary implications. We highlight outstanding questions critical to progress in understanding deimatism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Umbers, K. D. L., De Bona, S., White, T. E., Lehtonen, J., Mappes, J., & Endler, J. A. (2017, April 1). Deimatism: A neglected component of antipredator defence. Biology Letters. Royal Society. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0936

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free