Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations

187Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Children's performance in the classical a:b::c:d analogy task is traditionally very poor prior to the Piagetian stage of formal operations. The interpretation has been that the ability to reason about higher-order relations (the relations between the a:b and c:d parts of the analogy) is late-developing. However, an alternative possibility is that the relations used to date in the analogies are too difficult for younger children. Two experiments presented children aged 3, 4 and 6 years with a:b::c:d analogies which were based on relations of physical causality such as melting and cutting, for example chocolate bar: melted chocolate:: snowman:melted snowman. Understanding of these particular causal relations is known to develop between the ages of 3 and 4 years. It was found that even 3-years-olds could solve the classical analogies if they understood the causal relations on which they were based. © 1990.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goswami, U., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90037-K

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free