Comparison of two Classification methods (MLC and SVM) to extract land use and land cover in Johor Malaysia

75Citations
Citations of this article
168Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mapping is essential for the analysis of the land use and land cover, which influence many environmental processes and properties. For the purpose of the creation of land cover maps, it is important to minimize error. These errors will propagate into later analyses based on these land cover maps. The reliability of land cover maps derived from remotely sensed data depends on an accurate classification. In this study, we have analyzed multispectral data using two different classifiers including Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). To pursue this aim, Landsat Thematic Mapper data and identical field-based training sample datasets in Johor Malaysia used for each classification method, which results indicate in five land cover classes forest, oil palm, urban area, water, rubber. Classification results indicate that SVM was more accurate than MLC. With demonstrated capability to produce reliable cover results, the SVM methods should be especially useful for land cover classification. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deilmai, B. R., Ahmad, B. B., & Zabihi, H. (2014). Comparison of two Classification methods (MLC and SVM) to extract land use and land cover in Johor Malaysia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 20). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/20/1/012052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free