Response to Comment on "A Well-Preserved Archaeopteryx Specimen with Theropod Features"

  • Mayr G
  • Peters D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We agree that statistical support for our proposed phylogeny is weak, but the monophyly of Aves favored by most current researchers is also weakly supported. In the absence of unambiguous apomorphies of a clade including Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis but not deinonychosaurs, we do not believe that the statistical comparisons made by Corfe and Butler challenge our hypothesis regarding the ancestry of birds.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mayr, G., & Peters, D. S. (2006). Response to Comment on “A Well-Preserved Archaeopteryx Specimen with Theropod Features.” Science, 313(5791), 1238–1238. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130964

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free