Ecological interactions among ants in the genus Linepithema, their phorid parasitoids, and ant competitors

32Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1. Many ant species abandon foraging and retreat underground when parasitoids in the dipteran family Phoridae are present. Although the influence of phorids on ant foraging is well documented, their influence on interspecific competition is less studied. This study examined whether phorids influenced the competitive ability of host ants in the genus Linepithema at two sites in Brazil. 2. The phorid Pseudacteon lontrae attacked Linepithema piliferum at one site, while the phorid Pseudacteon pusillus attacked an unknown Linepithema (Linepithema sp.) at the other site. Phorid parasitoids of Linepithema were far more common than phorids of other ant species. 3. Despite a high abundance of phorids, it was difficult to conclude that they influenced competition. Captures in pitfall traps indicated that host Linepithema were most active during times of day when phorids were inactive. 4. Camponotus rufipes and Brachymyrmex sp., the most common competitors of Linepithema sp. (60% of all interactions), dominated Linepithema sp. during the day regardless of phorids. Remaining ant species could not be evaluated individually because they interacted with Linepithema sp. infrequently. 5. Ectatomma brunneum was the most common competitor of L. piliferum (58% of all interactions). The high abundance of phorids at this site made it impossible to evaluate interactions between E. brunneum and L. piliferum in the absence of phorids. 6. Phorids seldom influenced exploitative competition by causing host Linepithema to abandon the bait when no ant competitors were present.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Orr, M. R., Dahlsten, D. L., & Benson, W. W. (2003). Ecological interactions among ants in the genus Linepithema, their phorid parasitoids, and ant competitors. Ecological Entomology, 28(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00506.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free