Is there a rationale for rationing chronic dialysis? A hospital based cohort study of factors affecting survival and morbidity

212Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine factors influencing survival and need for hospitalisation in patients needing dialysis, and to define the potential basis for rationing access to renal replacement therapy. Design: Hospital based cohort study of all patients starting dialysis over a 4year recruitment period (follow up 15-63months). Groups were defined on the basis of age, comorbidity, functional status, and whether dialysis initiation was planned or unplanned. Setting: Renal unit in a district general hospital, which acts as the main renal referral centre for four other such hospitals and serves a population of about 1.15million people. Subjects: 292 patients, mean age 61.3years (18-92years, SD 15.8), of whom 193(66%) were male, and 59(20%) were patients with diabetes. Dialysis initiation was planned in 163(56%) patients and unplanned in 129(44%). Main outcome measures: Overall survival, 1year survival, and hospitalisation rate. Results: Factors affecting survival in the Cox's proportional hazard model were Karnofsky performance score at presentation (hazard ratio 0.979,95% confidence interval 0.972to 0.986), comorbidity severity score (1.240,1.131to 1.340), age (1.036,1.018to 1.054), and myeloma (2.15,1.140to 4.042). The Karnofsky performance score used 3months before presentation was significant (0.970,0.956to 0.981), as was unplanned presentation in this model (1.796,1.233to 2.617). Using these factors, a high risk group of 26patients was defined, with 19.2% 1year survival. Denying dialysis to this group would save 3.2% of the total cost of the chronic programme but would sacrifice five long term survivors. Less rigorous definition of the high risk group would save more money but lose more long term survivors. Conclusions: Severity of comorbid conditions and functional capacity are more important than age in predicting survival and morbidity of patients on dialysis. Late referral for dialysis affects survival adversely. Denial of dialysis to patients in an extremely high risk group, defined by a new stratification based on logistic regression, would be of debatable benefit. © 1999, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chandna, S. M., Schulz, J., Lawrence, C., Greenwood, R. N., & Farrington, K. (1999). Is there a rationale for rationing chronic dialysis? A hospital based cohort study of factors affecting survival and morbidity. BMJ, 318(7178), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7178.217

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free