When blame avoidance backfires: Responses to performance framing and outgroup scapegoating during the COVID-19 pandemic

31Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Public officials use blame avoidance strategies when communicating performance information. While such strategies typically involve shifting blame to political opponents or other governments, we examine how they might direct blame to ethnic groups. We focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, where the Trump administration sought to shift blame by scapegoating (using the term “Chinese virus”) and mitigate blame by positively framing performance information on COVID-19 testing. Using a novel experimental design that leverages machine learning techniques, we find scapegoating outgroups backfired, leading to greater blame of political leadership for the poor administrative response, especially among conservatives. Backlash was strongest for negatively framed performance data, demonstrating that performance framing shapes blame avoidance outcomes. We discuss how divisive blame avoidance strategies may alienate even supporters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Porumbescu, G., Moynihan, D., Anastasopoulos, J., & Olsen, A. L. (2023). When blame avoidance backfires: Responses to performance framing and outgroup scapegoating during the COVID-19 pandemic. Governance, 36(3), 779–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free