Investigating the Efficacy of Clinical Trial Monitoring Strategies: Design and Implementation of the Cluster Randomized START Monitoring Substudy

11Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Trial monitoring protects participant safety and study integrity. While monitors commonly go on site to verify source data, there is little evidence that this practice is efficient or effective. An ongoing international HIV treatment trial (START) provides an opportunity to explore the usefulness of different monitoring approaches. Methods: All START sites are centrally monitored and required to follow a local monitoring plan requiring specific quality assurance activities. In addition, sites were randomized (1:1) to receive, or not receive, annual on-site monitoring. The study will determine if on-site monitoring increases the identification of major protocol deviations (eligibility or consent violations, improper study drug use, primary or serious event underreporting, data alteration or fraud). Results: The START study completed enrollment in December 2013, with planned follow-up through December 2016. The monitoring study is ongoing at 196 sites in 34 countries. Results are expected when the START study concludes in December 2016.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hullsiek, K. H., Kagan, J. M., Engen, N., Grarup, J., Hudson, F., Denning, E. T., … Belloso, W. H. (2015). Investigating the Efficacy of Clinical Trial Monitoring Strategies: Design and Implementation of the Cluster Randomized START Monitoring Substudy. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 49(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479014555912

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free