Is Return To Play At 6 Months After Latarjet Safe? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group Cohort Study

  • Frantz T
  • Everhart J
  • Neviaser A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose/Introduction: 1) To evaluate return of strength and range of motion 6 months after Latarjet; 2) to determine risk factors for failure to achieve return to play (RTP) criteria at 6 months. Methods: Ten participating sites throughout the United States enrolled patients in a multicenter prospective cohort study. In this cohort, 65 athletes (83% contact sports, 37% overhead sports) underwent Latarjet procedure for anterior instability (71% as primary procedure for instability, 29% after failure of prior stabilization procedure) (36% subscapularis split; 64% tenotomy) and met inclusion criteria (mean age 24.5 SD 8.2; 59 male, 6 female). Strength and range of motion were assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months after surgery. Consistent with traditional thought, RTP criteria were defined as full strength, as well as less than 20 degrees side-to-side range of motion deficits in all planes. The independent likelihood of strength and motion RTP criteria at 6 months was assessed with multivariate logistic regression modeling with adjustment as needed for age, sex, subscapularis split versus tenotomy, pre-operative strength/motion, percentage bone loss, number of prior dislocations, pre-operative subjective shoulder function (ASES and WOSI%), and participation in contact versus overhead sports. Results: 55% of patients failed to meet one or more return to play criteria: 6% failed for persistent weakness and 51% for ≥ 20° side to side loss of motion. There was no difference in failure to achieve RTP criteria at 6 months between subscapularis split (57%) versus tenotomy (47%) (p=0.49) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for failure to achieve either strength or ROM criteria were pre-op ASES scores (per 10 point decrease, adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 1.61 CI 1.14, 2.43; p=0.006), WOSI % (per 10% decrease, aOR 0.61 CI 0.38, 0.92; p=0.010, and a pre-operative side to side ROM deficit ≥20° in any plane (aOR 5.01 CI 1.42, 21.5, p=0.01) or deficits in external rotation at 90° abduction (per 10° increased deficit, aOR 1.64 CI 1.06, 2.88, p=0.02). Conclusion: A large percentage of athletes, 55%, fail to return to full, baseline strength and ROM 6-months post-operatively following Latarjet. Greater pre-operative stiffness, and subjective disability are risk factors for failure to meet either ROM or strength RTP criteria. Knowing many athletes return to sport well before 6 months despite not having return of full strength and ROM, return to play criteria following Latarjet should be transitioned away from strict chronological measures and towards sport- and position-specific, functionally based metrics, considering both objective and subjective findings. Disclosure(s): No interests to disclose.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frantz, T. L., Everhart, J. S., Neviaser, A., Jones, G. L., Hettrich, C. M., Wolf, B. R., … Bishop, J. (2019). Is Return To Play At 6 Months After Latarjet Safe? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group Cohort Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 7(7_suppl5). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119s00274

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free