Deep Learning Ensemble Method for Classifying Glaucoma Stages Using Fundus Photographs and Convolutional Neural Networks

40Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This study developed and evaluated a deep learning ensemble method to automatically grade the stages of glaucoma depending on its severity. Materials and Methods: After cross-validation of three glaucoma specialists, the final dataset comprised of 3,460 fundus photographs taken from 2,204 patients were divided into three classes: unaffected controls, early-stage glaucoma, and late-stage glaucoma. The mean deviation value of standard automated perimetry was used to classify the glaucoma cases. We modeled 56 convolutional neural networks (CNN) with different characteristics and developed an ensemble system to derive the best performance by combining several modeling results. Results: The proposed method with an accuracy of 88.1% and an average area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.975 demonstrates significantly better performance to classify glaucoma stages compared to the best single CNN model that has an accuracy of 85.2% and an average area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.950. The false negative is the least adjacent misprediction, and it is less in the proposed method than in the best single CNN model. Conclusions: The method of averaging multiple CNN models can better classify glaucoma stages by using fundus photographs than a single CNN model. The ensemble method would be useful as a clinical decision support system in glaucoma screening for primary care because it provides high and stable performance with a relatively small amount of data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, H., Hwang, Y. H., Chung, J. K., Lee, K. B., Park, J. S., Kim, H. G., & Jeong, J. H. (2021). Deep Learning Ensemble Method for Classifying Glaucoma Stages Using Fundus Photographs and Convolutional Neural Networks. Current Eye Research, 46(10), 1516–1524. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2021.1900268

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free