Motor Proficiency and Physical Activity Behaviors Among Female College Students: Implications for Public Health and Physical Education

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Sedentary behavior is prevalent among female college students and may negatively affect motor competence—a key component of physical literacy and lifelong health. However, limited research has compared motor proficiency across distinct physical activity patterns in this population. This study aimed to examine differences in motor proficiency between sedentary and regularly active female college students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 292 female undergraduates (aged 18–21 years). Participants were retrospectively classified into a sedentary behavior group (SBG; n = 124) and a regular exercise group (REG; n = 168) according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF). Motor proficiency was evaluated using the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). Group differences were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and independent-samples t-tests. Results: The REG demonstrated significantly higher scores in manual coordination, body coordination, and strength and agility (all p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in fine motor control. The REG also exhibited a higher total BOT-2 score (p < 0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.56). Conclusions: Regular physical activity was associated with higher motor proficiency among female college students. As this study used a cross-sectional design, causal relationships cannot be inferred. Nonetheless, these findings highlight the potential importance of promoting active lifestyles in higher education to enhance motor competence and contribute to long-term public health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, N., Su, Z., Li, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2026). Motor Proficiency and Physical Activity Behaviors Among Female College Students: Implications for Public Health and Physical Education. Adolescents, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents6010001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free