Comparative study between an antigen test and the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in pediatrics

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light the need for rapid diagnostic tests. The gold standard test is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RT-PCR requires equipment and trained personnel, and results may take a long waiting time. The BD Veritor® System is a rapid chromatographic method used for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen in symptomatic individuals. The primary objective of this study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test (AT) compared to the RT-PCR in the pediatric population. Population and methods. Prospective study with a diagnostic test. All children younger than 17 years in the first 5 days of symptom onset, who consulted between July 2021 and February 2022, were included. A minimum of 300 specimens was estimated to achieve an accuracy of ±8.76% and ±3.68% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Specimens were analyzed in parallel using both methodologies. Results. Of 316 paired samples, 33 were positive by both methods; 6 were positive only by RT-PCR. The specificity of the AT was 100%; sensitivity was 84.6%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions. The AT proved to be useful in the diagnosis of pediatric patients with COVID-19 in the first 5 days of symptom onset, although those with a negative AT and high clinical suspicion should confirm their result with a RT-PCR.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parellada, C., Escarrá, F., Martínez, A., Videla, C., Amaya, L., Echegoyen, N., … Vidaurreta, S. (2023). Comparative study between an antigen test and the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in pediatrics. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria, 121(5). https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2022-02908.eng

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free