A “Necessary Evil”: Staff Perspectives of Soft Restraint Kit Use in a High-Security Hospital

7Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Forensic mental health nurses working at the forefront of services can intermittently face enduring and somewhat harrowing or stressful situations. Enclosed is an example of the use of mechanical restraints (Soft Restraint Kit) for a two month period. Staff experience of working under such circumstances is an under reported area. Methods: The experience of nursing a patient under extreme conditions was captured through use of a qualitative study, using semi structured interviews with a purposive sample of (n = 10) staff nurses and nursing assistants in a high-security hospital. Results: Thematic analysis was undertaken generating four themes: sense of responsibility, aptitude, enablers/inhibitors, and consequence. Conclusions suggest that Soft Restraint Kits provide a useful method of containment, although prolonged use presents considerable challenges for staff. The importance of preparation and training cannot be underestimated and continued support and supervision are absolutely essential.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walker, H., & Tulloch, L. (2020). A “Necessary Evil”: Staff Perspectives of Soft Restraint Kit Use in a High-Security Hospital. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free