Randomized comparison of low-dose versus high-dose interferon-alfa in chronic myeloid leukemia: Prospective collaboration of 3 joint trials by the MRC and HOVON groups

34Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The optimal dose of interferon-alfa (IFN) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is unknown. Retrospective analyses suggest that low doses are as effective as high doses, with less toxicity and fewer patients abandoning the drug. The Dutch Hemato-Oncology Association (HOVON) and British Medical Research Council (MRC) cooperative groups jointly performed randomized trials in newly diagnosed CML patients, comparing high-dose IFN (5 MIU/m2 daily) with low-dose (3 MIU, 5 times a week). Both arms allowed additional hydroxyurea to keep the white blood cell count lower than 5 × 10 9/L. Quality of life data were collected in a subset of patients. Between 1993 and 2001, 407 patients were randomized. At a median follow-up of 53 months, there were no significant differences in overall survival (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.46), progression-free survival, and complete hematologic or major cytogenetic responses. Fewer patients in the low-dose group abandoned IFN for reasons other than transplant or progressive disease (P = .002, 58% vs 72% at 5 years). Quality of life data showed comparable results in both arms for most factors. There is no evidence of benefit for high-dose IFN compared with low-dose for the treatment of CML. Therefore, when IFN is combined with other drugs, low-dose IFN is advised, to minimize toxicity and costs. © 2004 by The American Society of Hematology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kluin-Nelemans, H. C., Buck, G., Le Cessie, S., Richards, S., Beverloo, H. B., Falkenburg, J. H. F., … Shepherd, P. (2004). Randomized comparison of low-dose versus high-dose interferon-alfa in chronic myeloid leukemia: Prospective collaboration of 3 joint trials by the MRC and HOVON groups. Blood, 103(12), 4408–4415. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-10-3605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free