Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes after Ibrutinib Discontinuation Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: An Observational Study

  • Huntington S
  • De Nigris E
  • Puckett J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Most prior studies of ibrutinib discontinuation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) rely on data from clinical trials and/or selected medical centers, which are often limited to younger and/or commercially insured patients and may not be generalizable to routine clinical practice. Also, limited data are available on the next line of treatment initiated after ibrutinib discontinuation in the real-world setting. The objective of this study was to examine ibrutinib discontinuation patterns, overall survival (OS) and factors associated with these patterns among elderly Medicare beneficiaries in the U.S. Method(s): This retrospective cohort study used 2013-2019 100% Medicare claims data to identify beneficiaries who newly initiated ibrutinib from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018. Study eligibility criteria included: continuous Medicare Part A, B, and D coverage in 12-months before and at least 4-months after the index date (first ibrutinib prescription claim date), CLL/SLL diagnosis in the 12-month pre-index period and at any time over follow-up, >=66 years on index date, absence of >=2 diagnoses for another FDA-approved indication for ibrutinib, and absence of ibrutinib prescription in the 12-month pre-index period. Outcomes included ibrutinib discontinuation (defined as the presence of a consecutive 60-day gap in ibrutinib treatment), time to ibrutinib discontinuation, type of CLL/SLL treatment initiated after ibrutinib discontinuation, and OS. Cox regression models were used to examine factors associated with ibrutinib discontinuation. Result(s): Our final sample included a total of 11,870 Medicare patients newly initiating ibrutinib treatment. Nearly two-thirds (65.2%) of our cohort discontinued ibrutinib use over a median follow up of 25.2 months (IQR: 14.4-39.6) from initiation. Among those who discontinued ibrutinib, 51.1% discontinued within 6 months and 69.2% within 12 months. Among discontinuers, approximately 39% initiated another CLL/SLL treatment after ibrutinib discontinuation over a median follow up of 14.4 months (IQR: 4.8-27.6) post-ibrutinib discontinuation. Of the patients who initiated another CLL/SLL treatment after ibrutinib discontinuation, 21.3%, 18.9%, 10.8%, and 10.0% received venetoclax, rituximab, bendamustine and idelalisib, respectively, either as monotherapy or combination therapy. About 25% of patients who discontinued ibrutinib restarted treatment with ibrutinib at some point during follow-up. In multivariable analysis, patients aged >=80 years (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.41-1.63); lack of low-income subsidy (LIS) to cover all or part of prescription out-of-pocket costs (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.16); initiation of ibrutinib as part of combination therapy (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08-1.25); evidence of prior history of CLL treatment (HR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20); atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.27, 95% CI 1.19-1.35); conduction disorders (HR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20); heart failure (HR:1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17) and; any hospitalization in the 12-month pre-index period were associated with discontinuation (HR:1.10, 95% CI:1.04-1.16). Lastly, median OS in the entire sample was 4.4 years after ibrutinib initiation. The 3-year survival rate was 72.2% for non-discontinuers but only 56.8% for discontinuers. Among patients who discontinued

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huntington, S. F., De Nigris, E., Puckett, J., Kamal-Bahl, S., Farooqui, M. Z. H., Ryland, K. E., … Doshi, J. (2022). Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes after Ibrutinib Discontinuation Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: An Observational Study. Blood, 140(Supplement 1), 7939–7940. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-155903

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free