Cognitive control in closed head injury: Context maintenance dysfunction or prepotent response inhibition deficit?

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The authors contrasted 2 potential explanations for the cognitive control deficits observed in closed head injury (CHI): a prepotent response inhibition deficit or a deficit in context maintenance, defined as the guidance of appropriate responding by task-relevant information. Healthy and CHI participants performed the traditional card Stroop task and a single-trial Stroop task sensitive to context maintenance deficits. As predicted by a context maintenance deficit, moderate to severe CHI participants showed higher error rates in the single-trial Stroop task only, and only when task instructions had to be maintained over a long delay. Moreover, context maintenance impairment and generalized slowing were both related to reports of daily functioning in CHI participants. Thus, context maintenance could be a useful framework for characterizing cognitive control deficits in CHI. Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seignourel, P. J., Robins, D. L., Larson, M. J., Demery, J. A., Cole, M., & Perlstein, W. M. (2005). Cognitive control in closed head injury: Context maintenance dysfunction or prepotent response inhibition deficit? Neuropsychology, 19(5), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.578

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free