Should i Be Avoided or Embraced Exploring divergence between political scientist and student writing norms

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Political science instructors commonly emphasize the importance of effective writing. However, it is unclear that students either understand or share the norms about what this entails. A notable example is the appropriate use of voice. Prior literature has shown that academic writers often believe it is appropriate to use the pronoun I for a variety of rhetorical purposes but suggests that students may be unaware of this reasoning. We examine this topic by determining more precisely how commonly I is used in a major political science journal, conducting a survey of political science undergraduate students at a large comprehensive university, and interviewing political science faculty at the same university. Although each group's attitudes are complex, we find evidence that students' views commonly conflict with disciplinary norms. We close by considering the implications for teaching about writing in political science. © American Political Science Association 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lascher, E. L., & Melzer, D. (2013). Should i Be Avoided or Embraced Exploring divergence between political scientist and student writing norms. PS - Political Science and Politics, 46(4), 802–807. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001078

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free