A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies

10Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casaleiro, P., Relvas, A. P., & Dias, J. P. (2021). A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free