Allergy to penicillin: Fable or fact?

73Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To assess whether, on the basis of one blood test, penicillin allergy might be excluded sufficiently for general practitioners to give oral penicillin to patients claiming a history of penicillin allergy. Design-Prospective study of patients referred by general practitioners. Setting-Outpatient allergy clinic in a district general hospital. Patients - 175 referred patients who gave a history of immediate type reaction to penicillin, of whom 144 attended as requested and 132 completed the investigations. Main outcome measures - History and examination, serum radioallergosorbent test to phenoxymethylpenicillin and benzylpenicillin, and oral challenge with penicillin. Results-Of 132 patients, four were confirmed to have penicillin allergy by the radioallergosorbent test and 128 had an oral penicillin challenge without ill effect. Conclusions - Most patients who gave a history of penicillin allergy are not so allergic, and their actual allergic state should be substantiated whenever feasible. For patients reporting minor or vague reactions negative findings with a radioallergosorbent test to phenoxymethylpenicillin and benzylpenicillin provide sufficient evidence to give oral penicillin safely.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Surtees, S. J., Stockton, M. G., & Gietzen, T. W. (1991). Allergy to penicillin: Fable or fact? British Medical Journal, 302(6784), 1051–1052. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.302.6784.1051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free