Does delaying ureteral stent placement lead to higher rates of preoperative acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy?

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pregnancy with renal colic may cause pyelonephritis, decreased renal function, systemic infection and even shock in pregnant women, and cause premature birth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. When surgery is necessary, the relationship between timing of the operation and the outcome of the mother and child are not known. AIM To investigate the association between time to ureteral stent placement and clinical outcomes of patients with renal colic during pregnancy. METHODS In this retrospective study, pregnant women with renal colic who underwent surgery were studied. Maternal preoperative acute pyelonephritis (PANP), pregnancy outcome, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS 100 patients were included in the analysis, median age was 30 years. Median time to ureteral stent placement was 48 h (interquartile range, 25-96 h), and 32 patients (32%) were diagnosed with PANP. PANP was closely related to hospitalization costs, re-admission to the hospital due to urinary tract infection after surgery and premature delivery. Multivariate analysis found that stone location and time from pain to admission were related to PANP. CONCLUSION Both early and delayed surgery are safe and effective for the treatment of renal colic during pregnancy. Early surgery may be superior to a delayed procedure due to shorter LOS. For pregnant patients with renal colic, delayed surgery within 48 h is not related to the clinical outcome of the mother and child. However, the time from pain to hospital admission was related to PANP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, M. M., Lin, X. T., Xu, X. L., He, Z. H., & Lei, M. (2022). Does delaying ureteral stent placement lead to higher rates of preoperative acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy? World Journal of Clinical Cases, 10(3), 802–810. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.802

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free