Gender Representation in Editorial Boards and Governing Bodies of Scopus Scientific Journals: Analysis for Different Areas of Knowledge

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite efforts to achieve gender parity in multiple organizational spheres, women remain underrepresented in leadership positions, including in the scientific field. This study aimed to analyze gender representation on editorial boards of journals indexed in Scopus, focusing on the positions they hold to uncover potential inequalities. For this purpose, documentary research was carried out, employing secondary data sources, such as article reviews, databases, and journal websites. The data for the analysis was collected from the Scopus database on March 16, 2022, obtaining 27,060 records. Subsequently, a filter was applied to select journals in which at least one of their publication languages was Spanish (n=824), regardless of their country of origin. The results showed that slightly more than a quarter of the journals with editor positions had female leaders, and all other positions, except for secretary and editorial assistant, were male-dominated. In the main subject areas of Scopus, the position of director and/or editor showed a male predominance of 65.2%, the most notorious being in the field of physical sciences. When analyzing collegiate bodies, it was observed that over 85% had a mixed composition; however, it was not feasible to find gender parity in their composition. The study findings revealed a lack of diversity in the editorial bodies. It is recommended to undertake measures to promote gender equality and to increase the visibility of women's contributions in the scientific field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ganga-Contreras, F., Alarcón-Henríquez, N., Troncoso-Ahúes, E., & Suárez-Amaya, W. (2024). Gender Representation in Editorial Boards and Governing Bodies of Scopus Scientific Journals: Analysis for Different Areas of Knowledge. Profesional de La Informacion, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2024.0508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free