Promise versus reality: Optimism bias in package inserts for tuberculosis diagnostics

9Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Laboratorians and clinicians often rely on package inserts of diagnostic tests to assess their accuracy. We compared test accuracy for tuberculosis diagnostics reported in 19 package inserts against estimates in published meta-analyses and found that package inserts generally report overoptimistic accuracy estimates. However, package inserts of most tests approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or endorsed by the World Health Organization provide more realistic estimates that agree with meta-analyses. Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denkinger, C. M., Grenier, J., Minion, J., & Pai, M. (2012). Promise versus reality: Optimism bias in package inserts for tuberculosis diagnostics. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 50(7), 2455–2461. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00842-12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free