Hybrid bankruptcy forecasting for Indian firms: Integrating financial ratios, macroeconomic indicators, and random forest

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bankruptcy forecasting in emerging markets is complicated by macroeconomic and regulatory volatility. This study evaluates whether a hybrid model that integrates firm financial ratios, macro indicators, and a Random Forest classifier outperforms traditional ratio-only approaches for Indian firms. Each bankrupt company is analyzed over a five-year window preceding its actual failure date, resulting in ten bankrupt firms paired with ten matched healthy peers. Using these firm-specific five-year pre-bank-ruptcy panels, we estimate logistic regression and Random Forest models with strati-fied 5-fold cross-validation and derive a parsimonious four-factor risk score. Relative to ratio-only baselines, the hybrid design improves accuracy from 0.76→0.80 (logit) and 0.82→0.86 (Random Forest), and lifts the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) from 0.70→0.78, indicating that the model correctly ranks a bankrupt firm as riskier than a healthy firm 78% of the time. Debt-to-Equity, Current Ratio, Net Profit Margin, and GDP Growth dominate feature importance, and rising risk scores typi-cally cross ~0.40 two to three years before failure. Robustness checks, including alternative class-balance weights, sector dummies, and rolling-window estimation, yield comparable gains and stable feature rankings. The resulting bankruptcy Early-Warning System (EWS) is transparent, portfolio-scalable, and easily embedded into bank risk dashboards. The evidence shows that multidimen-sional hybrid models provide earlier and more reliable warnings than ratio-based for-mulas, offering practical value to lenders, investors, and regulators in volatile settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonelli, M. (2026). Hybrid bankruptcy forecasting for Indian firms: Integrating financial ratios, macroeconomic indicators, and random forest. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 23(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(2).2026.02

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free