In-Person or Virtual Training?: Comparing the Effectiveness of Community-Based Training

21Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine differences in knowledge gain by curriculum delivery platform for participants receiving a community-based healthy relationships curriculum for a vulnerable population with limited income and education. Using data gathered from 613 participants gathered in 2019–2020, those who received in-person training (n = 440) were compared to those who received synchronous virtual training (n = 173) on curriculum knowledge. Results indicate that in-person participants had statistically significantly higher gains in knowledge at posttest compared to the participants who received synchronous virtual training. The differences in knowledge gain were not accounted for by the demographics of the two groups. Implications include consideration of adaptations in virtual delivery that may close the gap between in-person and synchronous virtual training such as instruction techniques, presentation style, content and materials, and participant preparation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gross, G., Ling, R., Richardson, B., & Quan, N. (2023). In-Person or Virtual Training?: Comparing the Effectiveness of Community-Based Training. American Journal of Distance Education, 37(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2029090

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free