The arbitration-extension hypothesis: A hierarchical interpretation of the functional organization of the basal ganglia

17Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Based on known anatomy and physiology, we present a hypothesis where the basal ganglia motor loop is hierarchically organized in two main subsystems: the arbitration system and the extension system. The arbitration system, comprised of the subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus, and pedunculopontine nucleus, serves the role of selecting one out of several candidate actions as they are ascending from various brain stem motor regions and aggregated in the centromedian thalamus or descending from the extension system or from the cerebral cortex. This system is an action-input/action-output system whose winner-take-all mechanism fnds the strongest response among several candidates to execute. This decision is communicated back to the brain stem by facilitating the desired action via cholinergic/glutamatergic projections and suppressing conficting alternatives via GABAergic connections. The extension system, comprised of the striatum and, again, globus pallidus, can extend the repertoire of responses by learning to associate novel complex states to certain actions. This system is a state-input/ action-output system, whose organization enables it to encode arbitrarily complex Boolean logic rules using striatal neurons that only fre given specifc constellations of inputs (Boolean AND) and pallidal neurons that are silenced by any striatal input (Boolean OR). We demonstrate the capabilities of this hierarchical system by a computational model where a simulated generic "animal" interacts with an environment by selecting direction of movement based on combinations of sensory stimuli, some being appetitive, others aversive or neutral. While the arbitration system can autonomously handle conficting actions proposed by brain stem motor nuclei, the extension system is required to execute learned actions not suggested by external motor centers. Being precise in the functional role of each component of the system, this hypothesis generates several readily testable predictions. © 2011 Kamali Sarvestani, Lindahl, Hellgren-Kotaleski and Ekeberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarvestani, I. K., Lindahl, M., Hellgren-Kotaleski, J., & Ekeberg, Ö. (2011). The arbitration-extension hypothesis: A hierarchical interpretation of the functional organization of the basal ganglia. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, (MARCH 2011). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free