On dialogues and existences: A possible contribution of anthropology to agroecology

1Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We intend to problematize the agroecological "dialogue of knowledge" and survey the conditions of anthropology for such problems. The fundamental argument is that, despite the proposal of non-hierarchical construction of agroecological knowledge (between "scientific" and "non-scientific" knowledge), its epistemological basis does not comprises the complex interactions produced among the agents in question, ambivalently contributing to a hierarchical and asymmetric relationship of power. We suggest that: the idea that agroecology promotes harmonious relations between scientists and farmers simplifies interactions tensioned by the dynamic approximation/estrangement; the conception of culture and cultural diversity implicit in the dialogue of knowledge is based on the dissociation between "thought" and "action" a "political dynamics of alterity" would better define the agroecological relational scheme; the anthropological conception of translation would contribute to the promotion of a "double extensionality, " not based on the capacity to teach, but rather on the capacity to learn.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

da Silva Júnior, R. D., De Biase, L., & Martellini, F. (2019). On dialogues and existences: A possible contribution of anthropology to agroecology. Ambiente e Sociedade, 22. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC0060R1VU19L4AO

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free