Combating Grade Inflation in Nephrology Clinical Rotation Evaluations Using Faculty Education and a 5-Point Centered Rating Scale

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Background From 2010 to 2011, more than 70% of the clinical rotation competency evaluations for nephrology fellows in our program were rated "superior" using a 9-point Likert scale, suggesting some degree of "grade inflation." Objective We sought to assess the efficacy of a 5-point centered rotation evaluation in reducing grade inflation. Methods This retrospective cohort study of the impact of faculty education and a 5-point rotation evaluation on grade inflation was measured by superior item rating frequency and proportion of evaluations without superior ratings. The 5-point evaluation centered performance at the level expected for stage of training. Faculty education began in 2011-2012. The 5-point centered evaluation was introduced in 2012-2013 and used exclusively thereafter. A total of 68 evaluations, using the 9-point Likert scale, and 63 evaluations, using the 5-point centered scale, were performed after first-year fellow clinical rotations. Nine to 12 faculty members participated yearly. Results Faculty education alone was associated with fewer superior ratings from 2010-2011 to 2011-2012 (70.5% versus 48.3%, P = .001), declining further with 5-point centered scale introduction (2012-2013; 48.3% versus 35.6%; P = .012). Superior ratings declined with 5-point centered versus 9-point Likert scales (37.3% versus 59.3%, P = .001), specifically for medical knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, and professionalism. On logistic regression, evaluations without superior scores were more likely for 5-point centered versus 9-point Likert scales (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 8.26; 95% CI 1.53-44.64; P = .014) and associated with faculty identifier (aOR= 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.35; P = .013), but not fellow identifier or training year quarter. CONCLUSIONS: Grade inflation was reduced with faculty education and the 5-point centered evaluation scale.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yuan, C. M., Nee, R., Abbott, K. C., & Oliver, J. D. (2016). Combating Grade Inflation in Nephrology Clinical Rotation Evaluations Using Faculty Education and a 5-Point Centered Rating Scale. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00218.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free