Verbal sparring and apologetic points: Politeness in gendered argumentation contexts

22Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally attainable for women. Women in argumentation contexts face oppresssive limitations undermining argument success because their authority is undermined by gendered norms of politeness. Women endorsing or, alternatively, transgressing feminine norms of politeness typically defend their authority in argumentation contexts. And yet, defending authority renders it less legitimate. My argument focuses on women in philosophy but bears the implication that other masculine discourse contexts present similar double binds that urge social and political change. © Sylvia Burrow.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burrow, S. (2010). Verbal sparring and apologetic points: Politeness in gendered argumentation contexts. Informal Logic, 30(3), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i3.3033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free