A comparative study of OSCE and traditional methods of evaluation in nursing: A narrative review

  • Manar B
  • Siva N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a modern type of examination used in health sciences and it has been widely used in the assessment of students' clinical performance and skills competency. The Traditional method refers to a traditional way of evaluating a practical skills and knowledge of the students as in essay type i.e, written form, viva, procedure or history collection of the client. Aim: The aim of this narrative review is to find information on the effectiveness of OSCE versus Traditional methods of evaluation.Methodology: Types of studies- Descriptive- Comparative study, Quasi-experimental design- one group pre-test post-test design.Types of participants: Nursing students.Setting: Nursing Colleges.Outcome: This narrative review result shows that OSCE method is an effective method for evaluation compare to a Traditional method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manar, B., & Siva, N. (2019). A comparative study of OSCE and traditional methods of evaluation in nursing: A narrative review. International Journal of Advance Research in Nursing, 2(2), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.33545/nursing.2019.v2.i2.a.57

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free