Comparative costs of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose of review This article describes the most recent comparative cost evaluations for subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) immunotherapy. Recent findings Only one recent article compares the costs of SCIT and SLIT in America. No American publications assess direct and indirect costs together. Few studies outside of America assess these costs in detail. Summary Limited data exist on the direct and indirect costs of SCIT and SLIT in the United States. Studies suggest that SLIT may be more affordable when taking indirect costs into account. Costs for SLIT may be more contained if physicians are more selective in the number and volume of antigens utilized per patient. Recent Food and Drug Administration approval of select sublingual tablets in America is changing the payment methodology for SLIT in America. Limited data on the cost in America call for further American studies on this topic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

French, C., & Seiberling, K. (2015, January 1). Comparative costs of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free