Traumatic vessel injuries initiating hemostasis generate high shear conditions

24Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Blood flow is a major regulator of hemostasis and arterial thrombosis. The current view is that low and intermediate flows occur in intact healthy vessels, whereas high shear levels (.2000 s21) are reached in stenosed arteries, notably during thrombosis. To date, the shear rates occurring at the edge of a lesion in an otherwise healthy vessel are nevertheless unknown. The aim of this work was to measure the shear rates prevailing in wounds in a context relevant to hemostasis. Three models of vessel puncture and transection were developed and characterized for a study that was implemented in mice and humans. Doppler probe measurements supplemented by a computational model revealed that shear rates at the edge of a wound reached high values, with medians of 22000 s21, 25000 s21, and 7000 s21 after puncture of the murine carotid artery, aorta, or saphenous vein, respectively. Similar shear levels were observed after transection of the mouse spermatic artery. These results were confirmed in a human venous puncture model, where shear rates in a catheter implanted in the cubital vein reached 2000 to 27000 s21. In all models, the high shear conditions were accompanied by elevated levels of elongational flow exceeding 1000 s21. In the puncture model, the shear rates decreased steeply with increasing injury size. This phenomenon could be explained by the low hydrodynamic resistance of the injuries as compared with that of the downstream vessel network. These findings show that high shear rates (.3000 s21) are relevant to hemostasis and not exclusive to arterial thrombosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yakusheva, A. A., Butov, K. R., Bykov, G. A., Závodszky, G., Eckly, A., Ataullakhanov, F. I., … Mangin, P. H. (2022). Traumatic vessel injuries initiating hemostasis generate high shear conditions. Blood Advances, 6(16), 4834–4846. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free