Abstract
Epistemologists often suppose that the extent to which evidence e confirms hypothesis H depends on probabilities involving e and H, and nothing more. We show experimentally that human reasoners sometimes violate this assumption. Copyright 2007 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Tentori, K., Crupi, V., & Osherson, D. (2007). Determinants of confirmation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(5), 877–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194115
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free